- Two editions — everything moving the market, and a second one rebuilt around the symbols you actually hold and watch.
- Headlines attached to the companies they are about, so a story arrives next to the price it concerns.
- No tier and no paywall. The whole feed, for everybody.
The problem is not access, it is volume
Thirty years ago the difficulty was getting market news at all. That problem is comprehensively solved, and it has been replaced by a harder one: far more is published every day than any person can read, and the volume has no relationship to how much actually happened.
Quiet days produce roughly as many articles as eventful ones, because the number of people writing does not fall when there is less to write about. So the size of the feed tells you nothing, and reading more of it does not get you closer to understanding the day. What helps is a way of deciding what to skip.
An explanation is not a cause
This is the single most useful habit, and it costs nothing.
Markets move for reasons that are frequently not knowable, and financial journalism is nonetheless required to produce a reason by the close. The result is a genuine literary form: "Stocks fell as investors weighed…" — a sentence written after the fall, fitted to it, and just as easily fitted to a rise if the number had gone the other way. It is not dishonest. It is a description with the grammar of a cause.
The test is timing. Did the story exist before the move, or did it appear to explain it? News that genuinely moves a price is usually identifiable because the price moved when it landed — an earnings release, a guidance change, a regulator's decision. Anything that appeared afterwards is commentary, and commentary is worth reading for context and worth ignoring as evidence.
| Kind of story | Arrived | Worth |
|---|---|---|
| Company filing or results | At a scheduled time | High — it is the primary source |
| Guidance change, regulatory decision | When it happened | High — a real change in the facts |
| "Stocks fell as investors weighed…" | After the close | Context at best |
| Analyst opinion pieces | Any time | See analyst ratings |
| Price-target round-ups | Constantly | Low — the level is near-baseline |
The company's own words are free
Every US listed company files its results with the SEC, and those filings are public, free, and the primary source that every article about them is derived from. The quarterly report is Form 10-Q, the annual one is Form 10-K, and anything material enough to announce between them arrives as an 8-K. All of them are searchable on the SEC's EDGAR for nothing.
You do not need to read filings routinely. But when a story matters enough to act on, the filing is what is actually true, and the gap between a filing and the article about it is sometimes remarkable. It is the cheapest available correction to a headline.
Build the feed around what you hold
The most effective filter is not a topic list. It is starting from your own positions rather than from what is being published.
A general market feed is optimised for the average reader, who does not exist. A feed built from the companies you own and the ones on your watchlist is a small fraction of the volume and almost all of the relevance — and, importantly, it is a fixed amount of reading. It does not expand on a busy day, because your holdings did not.
Both are worth having, for different reasons. The broad edition tells you what kind of day it is; the personal one tells you whether any of it was about you. What the broad edition should never be is the default, because a front page sorted by what is loudest is sorted by something that has nothing to do with you.
Our feed has two editions for exactly the reason above, and the personal one is the harder of the two to build — it needs a story to be reliably attached to the company it concerns, and headline text is a poor way to do that. A story mentioning a large company in passing is not a story about it.
What we would rather admit than dress up: this is imperfect and always will be. Symbol tagging on news is genuinely difficult, and the failure mode we chose is to be conservative — we would rather miss a story that mentions your company in the last paragraph than fill your personal feed with articles that are not about you. A personal feed you stop trusting is worse than no personal feed, because it costs you the general one too.
Is the news feed free?
Yes — free, both editions, no tier and no credit card, alongside the earnings calendar that tells you which of your companies is about to produce real news rather than commentary about it.
We have no testimonials. The platform is new and we are not going to invent any. What we have instead is the thing testimonials are a proxy for: every position opened through the app is priced and timestamped by us and written to a log that cannot be edited or deleted by anyone, including an administrator. Losses stay in. A member's own typed-in history is kept separate, labelled, and counts towards nothing anyone else sees.
Free, no credit card, no tier. Trading here is simulated, and none of this is investment advice.
SigniBull is not a broker and the trading is simulated — you are practising and comparing ideas, not moving real money. Market data comes from outside providers and can be delayed or incomplete. Not investment advice.